Cryptocurrency regulation in the United States is anything but straightforward. Since the collapse of FTX in late 2022, global regulators have intensified efforts to define oversight frameworks for digital assets. In the U.S., two key agencies—SEC and CFTC—frequently appear in headlines, issuing statements and launching investigations. But what exactly do they regulate, and how do their jurisdictions overlap in the crypto space?
This article breaks down the roles of major U.S. financial regulators, explores how cryptocurrencies are classified under current law, and uses real-world examples like Coinbase to illustrate the complexity of regulatory compliance in the blockchain industry.
👉 Discover how global regulations shape crypto trading environments today.
Understanding the Key Regulators: SEC vs. CFTC
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the primary regulator of securities markets in the United States. Established in 1934, it oversees all entities involved in the issuance, trading, and management of securities such as stocks and bonds.
Securities generally fall into two categories:
- Debt instruments – including government or corporate bonds, promissory notes
- Equity instruments – such as company shares traded on public exchanges
Holding a security means owning a financial claim—either ownership (equity) or creditor rights (debt). For example:
- A bondholder has the right to repayment plus interest at maturity
- A shareholder owns a proportional stake in a company’s value and may vote on corporate decisions
When a digital asset functions like an investment contract—where investors expect profits from the efforts of others—it may be deemed a security under the Howey Test, a legal framework established by the Supreme Court. This is where the SEC asserts jurisdiction over certain cryptocurrencies.
If a token is offered through an initial coin offering (ICO) with promises of returns managed by a central team, it likely falls under SEC oversight. Projects that fail to register their tokens as securities risk enforcement actions, fines, or trading suspensions.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
In contrast, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates derivatives markets tied to commodities. Created in 1974, it oversees futures, options, and swaps contracts based on underlying physical or financial assets.
Traditionally, these included agricultural products (wheat, corn), energy resources (oil, natural gas), and precious metals (gold, silver). Over time, the scope expanded to include financial instruments such as foreign currencies and stock indices.
Major exchanges regulated by the CFTC include:
- New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) – originally focused on dairy products
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) – evolved from an agricultural exchange
- Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) – world's oldest futures exchange
These institutions are now part of CME Group, the largest derivatives marketplace globally. Notably, CME launched Bitcoin and Ethereum futures contracts—products only possible if crypto is classified as a commodity.
Because Congress has not passed comprehensive crypto legislation, regulators rely on existing frameworks. Under current interpretation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are treated as commodities, placing them under CFTC authority when traded as futures or derivatives.
Where Do Cryptocurrencies Fit? Commodities or Securities?
This is the core dilemma in U.S. crypto regulation: classification ambiguity.
Currently, no federal law explicitly defines whether a cryptocurrency is a security, commodity, or something entirely new. Instead, classification depends on context and functionality:
- If a crypto asset behaves like an investment vehicle with centralized management and profit expectations → likely a security (SEC jurisdiction)
- If it functions as a decentralized medium of exchange or store of value → treated as a commodity (CFTC jurisdiction)
For instance:
- Bitcoin (BTC) is widely recognized as a commodity due to its decentralized nature and lack of issuer control
- Uniswap’s UNI token, however, gives holders governance rights over protocol upgrades and fee structures—features resembling shareholder influence in traditional corporations
In 2021, Uniswap Labs received a "Wells Notice" from the SEC, signaling potential enforcement action over whether its token constitutes an unregistered security. This illustrates how governance-enabled tokens blur regulatory lines.
👉 Explore platforms adapting to evolving regulatory landscapes worldwide.
Case Study: Coinbase and Multi-Agency Compliance
Coinbase, one of the largest U.S.-based crypto exchanges, exemplifies how complex compliance can be across multiple regulatory domains. It doesn't operate under a single authority but must navigate overlapping jurisdictions depending on the product offered.
SEC Oversight: Public Listing and Equity Disclosure
Coinbase Global, Inc. went public via direct listing on Nasdaq in April 2021. As a publicly traded company, it files regular disclosures with the SEC—including annual reports (Form 10-K) and quarterly updates (Form 10-Q)—ensuring transparency for investors.
CFTC and Derivatives Expansion
Beyond spot trading, Coinbase has expanded into derivatives through subsidiaries:
- Coinbase Derivatives Exchange (formerly FairX) – acquired in 2022 and registered with the CFTC as a designated contract market (DCM), enabling futures trading
- Nodal Clear – a CFTC-regulated clearinghouse that processes trades for both Nodal Exchange and Coinbase Derivatives
- Coinbase FCM – intended to become a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), applying for registration with the National Futures Association (NFA) in 2021; status remains pending as of 2025
This layered structure shows that even a single platform may interact with multiple regulators based on service type—spot trading vs. futures vs. clearing services.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Which agency has more power over cryptocurrency—the SEC or CFTC?
A: Neither has absolute authority. The SEC leads on enforcement related to token sales and investment contracts, while the CFTC governs futures markets and commodity classification. Their overlapping mandates often lead to regulatory uncertainty.
Q: Can a cryptocurrency be both a security and a commodity?
A: Legally, no—it must be classified as one or the other depending on use case and structure. However, some tokens may shift categories over time (e.g., transitioning from centralized development to full decentralization).
Q: Why hasn’t Congress passed clear crypto laws yet?
A: Lawmakers face challenges defining digital assets within existing financial categories. Debates continue over consumer protection, innovation incentives, tax treatment, and inter-agency coordination. Several bills have been proposed but none enacted as of 2025.
Q: Are stablecoins regulated in the U.S.?
A: Not uniformly. Stablecoins backed by fiat reserves may fall under banking laws or money transmission rules. Algorithmic stablecoins could be scrutinized under securities or commodities laws depending on design. Regulatory clarity is still emerging.
Q: How do other countries approach crypto regulation differently?
A: The EU enforces MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), offering unified rules across member states. Singapore and Switzerland provide clear licensing paths for exchanges. In contrast, the U.S. relies on enforcement-first tactics without comprehensive legislation.
Q: What should investors watch for regarding regulatory risks?
A: Monitor SEC lawsuits against exchanges or issuers, CFTC actions on derivatives licensing, and congressional hearings on digital asset bills. Regulatory shifts can impact market access, trading availability, and asset valuations.
Final Thoughts: Navigating Regulatory Complexity
The collapse of FTX accelerated global scrutiny of cryptocurrency markets—but in the U.S., effective oversight remains fragmented. Key takeaways include:
- SEC regulates securities, which may include certain tokens sold with profit expectations
- CFTC oversees commodities and derivatives, covering Bitcoin futures and similar products
- Classification determines jurisdiction, yet many assets fall into gray areas
- Platforms like Coinbase must comply with multiple agencies, reflecting the multifaceted nature of crypto services
Until Congress passes dedicated legislation, market participants will continue navigating this dual-regulatory landscape—one defined by evolving interpretations rather than clear rules.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory trends shaping the future of digital finance.