The IOTA network operates on a unique distributed ledger technology called the Tangle, which diverges significantly from traditional blockchain architectures. Instead of blocks chained in sequence, IOTA uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure where every transaction confirms two previous ones. This innovative design enables feeless microtransactions, high scalability, and decentralized consensus without miners. In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore how transactions are added, confirmed, and how consensus is achieved in IOTA’s Tangle network.
The Initial State of the Tangle
Unlike blockchains that rely on sequential blocks, the Tangle allows parallel transaction validation. Each new transaction must approve two prior unconfirmed transactions—known as tips—by performing lightweight proof-of-work (PoW) and verifying digital signatures. This creates a web-like structure where confirmation is cumulative and probabilistic.
In visual representations of the Tangle:
- Green nodes represent transactions with high confirmation certainty.
- Blue nodes indicate partial confirmation.
- Gray or yellow nodes are tips—new, unconfirmed transactions awaiting validation.
- Red nodes denote conflicting or invalid transactions, such as double spends.
A special case like transaction α may reference one tip (l) and an older non-tip transaction (h). While not standard, this behavior is permitted by the protocol and helps maintain network flexibility.
👉 Discover how decentralized networks achieve trustless consensus without traditional mining.
Adding a New Transaction to the Tangle
To submit a transaction, a user must:
- Select two random tips from the network.
- Validate their signatures and ensure they don’t conflict with prior transactions.
- Perform minimal PoW to prevent spam.
- Attach the new transaction to both tips, thereby confirming them.
This mechanism distributes validation responsibilities across all participants. No single node needs to validate the entire ledger—only a small portion. Over time, overlapping validations create collective agreement on transaction legitimacy.
Transactions not directly or indirectly referenced during this process remain unconfirmed but can be picked up later by subsequent users selecting different tip pairs.
Concurrent Transaction Addition
Multiple users can independently add transactions at different points in the Tangle. For example, while one user validates tips z and y, another might choose 1 and 2. These parallel actions expand the scope of confirmed transactions, reinforcing consensus across broader segments of the graph.
Each new transaction strengthens the confirmation of earlier ones it references—either directly or through indirect paths. As more transactions are added, certain nodes become deeply embedded in the Tangle, making reversal statistically improbable.
The Evolving Tangle State
As transactions 1 and 2 are added, their validation paths overlap on shared ancestors like a through k. Transactions confirmed by multiple paths—such as n—gain higher confidence levels and shift from blue to green status.
Key insights:
- Decentralized validation: Users only verify a fraction of the Tangle, yet collectively secure the entire network.
- Progressive confirmation: A transaction becomes fully confirmed when it's referenced—directly or indirectly—by nearly all current tips.
- Efficient verification: Recipients can assess confirmation by sampling a subset of tips rather than scanning all, enabling scalable checks even with thousands of active tips.
Statistical sampling ensures practicality: checking 100 random tips out of 10,000 provides strong probabilistic assurance without computational overload.
👉 Learn how next-gen ledgers enable instant, feeless digital value transfer.
Confirmation Levels and Practical Acceptance
Confirmation isn't binary—it's a matter of degree. Merchants or service providers can set their own thresholds based on risk tolerance:
- High-value transfers: Require >90% tip coverage for near-certainty.
- Micropayments or trusted peers: Accept 75% (e.g., 3 out of 4 tips) to prioritize speed.
For instance, transactions l, o, and t might reach acceptable confidence at 75%, allowing faster settlement in low-risk scenarios. This flexibility makes IOTA ideal for IoT devices and real-time payments.
Handling Propagation Delays
Network latency or slow PoW can cause delayed transactions like 5 to emerge after others. Initially, transaction n may appear fully confirmed—but once 5 arrives and references different branches, the confirmation ratio drops slightly (e.g., from 100% to 80%).
However:
- This doesn't invalidate previously accepted transactions.
- It merely adjusts the mathematical certainty.
- Subsequent transactions referencing both branches restore full confirmation over time.
Absolute 100% confirmation is theoretically unattainable due to rogue or non-compliant tips, but probabilistic finality ensures practical immutability.
Double Spending in the Tangle
Double spending occurs when a malicious actor issues two conflicting transactions (e.g., w and y) using the same funds. Early validators may confirm one branch without seeing the conflict due to limited visibility.
Eventually, a transaction like 5 will encounter both conflicting entries during its tip selection. Upon detecting inconsistency:
- It rejects the conflicting pair.
- Repeats tip selection until it finds two compatible transactions.
- Ensures its own validity before being accepted into the Tangle.
This self-policing mechanism prevents invalid chains from growing unchecked.
Resolving Conflicts and Achieving Consensus
When conflict arises, resolution depends on cumulative weight and random tip selection:
- Whichever branch attracts more follow-up transactions gains momentum.
- The losing branch stalls, becoming orphaned.
For example, if transactions 5, 6, and 8 build on w, while only 7 supports y, the w branch dominates. Transactions y, 2, 3, and 7 remain unconfirmed but aren’t lost—they can be reattached to valid parts of the Tangle with fresh PoW.
Reattachment allows recovery without resubmitting signatures, preserving usability while maintaining security.
FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How does IOTA achieve consensus without miners?
A: IOTA uses a coordinator-free model where each user validates two previous transactions before submitting their own. This mutual verification builds probabilistic consensus over time through cumulative confirmations.
Q: Can a transaction ever be 100% confirmed?
A: True 100% confirmation is rare due to network dynamics and non-compliant nodes. However, once a transaction reaches high cumulative weight and is referenced by nearly all tips, reversal becomes statistically negligible.
Q: What happens to double-spent transactions?
A: One branch survives based on network acceptance; the other is abandoned. Conflicting transactions can be reattached after resolving conflicts, allowing legitimate use cases to proceed.
Q: Is offline transaction processing possible in IOTA?
A: Yes. Offline sub-Tangles can operate locally and later merge with the main Tangle via a commit transaction that bridges the final offline tip with current online tips.
Q: How does IOTA handle network partitions?
A: During disconnections, isolated networks build separate branches. Upon reconnection, conflicting transactions are resolved via cumulative weight, similar to double-spend resolution.
Q: Do users need to pay fees for IOTA transactions?
A: No. IOTA eliminates fees by requiring each participant to contribute validation work instead of paying miners, enabling true microtransactions.
Offline Tangle Operations
IOTA supports offline transaction chaining within private networks (e.g., factory floors or remote sensors). A group can generate transactions 1 through 7 locally, linking them to the last known online tip. Once connectivity resumes:
- A "commit" transaction (
8) merges the offline chain with the live Tangle. - Online users who select
8as a tip automatically validate all prior offline transactions.
Crucially:
- Offline transactions only gain full confirmation after integration.
- Any conflict with the main Tangle (e.g., double spend) causes rejection until resolved.
- Detection may take several confirmations, depending on propagation speed.
This capability enables robust use in intermittent-connectivity environments—critical for industrial IoT and edge computing applications.
👉 Explore platforms supporting advanced DAG-based digital asset management.